Aashcharyavat pashyati kashchid enam aashcharyavad vadati tathaiva chaanyah | aashcharyavach chainam anyah shrinoti shrutvaapyenam veda na chaiva kashchit ||29||
Translation
Some look upon the soul as amazing, some describe it as amazing, and some hear of it as amazing, while others, even after hearing about it, cannot understand it at all.
Commentary
Commentary
Verse 2:29 is the great pause in the middle of the argument — a moment of genuine awe and intellectual humility. Having described the soul’s nature across a dozen verses, Krishna now says, in effect: even with all these descriptions, the Atman remains fundamentally astonishing and ultimately beyond the reach of ordinary understanding.
Aashcharyavat: The Wonder
The word aashcharyavat — “like a wonder,” “as something marvelous” — appears three times in rapid succession, each time attached to a different mode of encountering the Atman: seeing it, speaking of it, and hearing of it. The repetition creates a mounting sense of mystery. No matter how the soul is approached — through direct perception, through teaching, through listening — it retains its quality of profound wonder.
Four Modes of Encountering the Atman
Krishna describes four types of people in relation to the soul’s knowledge:
- The seer (pashyati) — one who encounters the Atman through direct contemplation or mystical experience and is struck with wonder
- The speaker (vadati) — one who has understood it well enough to teach it, yet finds that even in speaking, the wonder does not diminish
- The hearer (shrinoti) — one who receives the teaching with genuine openness and experiences it as marvelous
- The uncomprehending — one who has heard all of this and still cannot grasp it
The last category is not a condemnation. Krishna is simply acknowledging a truth about this knowledge: it is not the kind of information that can be absorbed passively. Intellectual understanding alone is not enough.
Why Even Hearing Is Not Enough
The Katha Upanishad makes the same point: “This Atman cannot be known by instruction, nor by intelligence, nor by much learning. It can be known only by the one whom it chooses.” The Atman is not an object of knowledge the way a fact is. It is the very subject of all knowing — consciousness itself attempting to know consciousness. This creates a kind of irreducible mystery that no amount of description can dissolve.
The Proper Response: Wonder Without Despair
This verse might seem to end the teaching in uncertainty, but the opposite is true. The wonder (aashcharya) that Krishna describes is not the wonder of confusion but the wonder of genuine contact with the extraordinary. To encounter the Atman — even through hearing, even imperfectly — and to be moved by that encounter is already a form of participation in what cannot be fully understood. The appropriate response is not to stop seeking, but to seek with a sense of reverence and openness rather than with the demand for complete conceptual mastery.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does Bhagavad Gita 2.29 mean?
- Some look upon the soul as amazing, some describe it as amazing, and some hear of it as amazing, while others, even after hearing about it, cannot understand it at all.
- What is the Sanskrit text of Bhagavad Gita 2.29?
- The original Sanskrit verse is: Aashcharyavat pashyati kashchid enam aashcharyavad vadati tathaiva chaanyah | aashcharyavach chainam anyah shrinoti shrutvaapyenam veda na chaiva kashchit ||29||
- What are the key themes of this verse?
- This verse explores: atman, knowledge, wonder, mystery, understanding, soul, consciousness.